Below is a detailed party story for the Secular Koranist Party of America (SKPA), set in a near-future America under Secular Koranism, focusing on an Unaffiliated Christian woman accused of heresy by a Catholic and brought before a party inquiry board to determine her status. The story incorporates all the data provided on Secular Koranism—its definition, laws, the Secular Koranist Constitution, the SKPA Party Constitution, the SKPA Manifesto, and prior pamphlets—integrating the woman’s defense using the Jefferson Bible, the party’s lack of a clear definition of blasphemy in Christianity, and the final verdict that both she and Thomas Jefferson are heretics, framed as a non-insulting outcome.
The Heresy Hearing of Hannah Green
In the sterile hearing room of the Secular Koranist Party of America (SKPA) office in Cleveland, Ohio, on a crisp April morning in 2027, Hannah Green sat nervously before the party inquiry board. The 29-year-old IC1 White Unaffiliated Christian, a barista and mother of two, had been accused of heresy by a Catholic neighbor, Sister Margaret O’Connor. Under the SKPA’s updated State Religious Registry System (March 2025), Christians were classified as Church-Confirmed, Unaffiliated, or Heretics, with heresy cases requiring a party inquiry. Hannah’s alleged heresy? Claiming Jesus’ miracles were mere parables, never historical events—a stance that had landed her in this predicament.
The room buzzed with tension as Clara Nguyen, the IC5 Chinese SKPA representative and inquiry board chair, adjusted her militia vest. Flanking her were two Judicial Committee members—Jacob Blum, an IC1 White Heretical Jew, and Aisha Patel, an IC4 Asian Muslim—both trained in Secular Koranism’s data-driven ethos. The SKPA, ruling since 2025 under the Secular Koranist Constitution, had transformed America with no usury, a 20% flat tax, and socialized medicine, but its registry system was now stirring up trouble. “Let’s begin,” Clara said, her voice sharp. “Sister Margaret, state your accusation.”
Margaret, a Confirmed Catholic with a rosary dangling from her neck, stood. “Hannah Green told my Bible study group that Jesus’ miracles—walking on water, raising Lazarus—were just parables, not real. That’s heresy! She denies Christ’s divinity!” Margaret’s voice trembled with indignation, her registry card (Confirmed Catholic) clutched tightly.
Hannah, her Unaffiliated Christian card on the table, rose to defend herself. “I’m not denying Jesus—I’m saying the miracles are symbolic, not literal. And I’m not alone!” She pulled out a worn copy of the Jefferson Bible, a text Thomas Jefferson had edited in 1820, removing all miracles and supernatural elements to focus on Jesus’ moral teachings. “Jefferson thought the same—miracles were parables, not history. If I’m a heretic, then so was he—a Founding Father! You can’t call me out without calling him out too.”
The board exchanged uneasy glances. Clara frowned, flipping through the Secular Koranist Constitution. “This is tricky,” she muttered to Jacob. “We’ve got no definition of blasphemy in Christianity—Koran 2:256 says ‘no compulsion in religion,’ and the Koran has no blasphemy penalties. We define idolatry as ‘not being guided by Torah or Quran,’ but heresy? That’s Christian territory.” Jacob nodded, his Heretical Jew status making him sympathetic to Hannah’s plight. “Orthodox Jews rank religions by Noahide Laws—Trinity’s idolatry—but heresy’s vague. Public Law 102-14 doesn’t cover this.”
Aisha, the Muslim board member, chimed in. “Muslims self-ID—no verification. Christians need baptism or confirmation, or they’re Unaffiliated. But heresy inquiries? We’ve got no standard. Beyondism tracks stats—Unaffiliated Christians lag in cohesion—but what’s heresy?”
The inquiry dragged on, the board poring over registry data. Hannah’s stats—IC1, Unaffiliated, RUP (repentant unmarried parent, post-2026 grace)—showed her kids in B+ schools, a step below MP (married parents) in A schools. Her life was orderly: she paid the flat tax, volunteered in the citizens’ militia, and supported no usury. But her claim—miracles as parables—challenged Christian doctrine, per Margaret’s accusation.
Hannah pressed her defense. “Jefferson owned a Koran—his freedom of religion, First Amendment, maybe came from Koran 2:256! He cut miracles from the Bible because he valued reason, like Claire Khaw does. If I’m a heretic, so was he—and he built this nation!” She held up the Jefferson Bible, its pages marked. “I’m not denying Jesus’ teachings—just the magic. That’s not heresy; it’s reason!”
Clara sighed, the board’s dilemma clear. “We’re not theologians,” she said. “Secular Koranism’s agnostic—Claire’s vision, no faith. We’ve got no Christian blasphemy definition. Idolatry’s clear—Trinity’s unguided, per Noahide—but heresy? Margaret says denying miracles denies divinity. Hannah says it’s reason, like Jefferson.” Jacob scratched his head. “Jefferson’s a Founder—Public Law 102-14 ties us to Noahide, but his Bible… it’s heretical by Catholic standards.” Aisha added, “Our 2028 utopia—crime down, families stable—needs order, not Christian squabbles. But we can’t ignore the registry.”
After hours of debate, Clara called for a verdict. “Here’s our ruling,” she announced, her voice steady. “Hannah Green, your claim—miracles as parables—denies Christ’s divinity, a core Catholic doctrine. By Christian standards, that’s heresy. The Jefferson Bible supports your view, but it also makes Thomas Jefferson a heretic by the same measure. We find you both heretics—your registry status shifts to Christian Heretics, effective today.”
Hannah’s face fell, but Clara raised a hand. “This isn’t an insult. Jefferson, a heretic, built America—his reason, his Koran-inspired freedom (Koran 2:256), shaped us. You’re in good company. Secular Koranism values law, not faith—your stats (education, crime) still count. File with the Department of Complaints and Suggestions (DCS) if you disagree—DFD debates it on state TV next month.”
Margaret smirked, satisfied, but Hannah stood tall. “I’ll take it—Jefferson’s my heretic hero. I’ll stay Christian, even Heretical.” She left, her kids’ B+ school status unchanged, her resolve firm. The board sighed—order held, but Christian heresy was a mess they’d need to define. For now, the Caliphate’s data-driven march continued, heretics and all.
Notes on the Story
- Data Integration: Incorporates Secular Koranism’s core (agnosticism, Claire Khaw, Koran 2:256), laws (no usury, flat tax, lashes, marriage contracts, socialized medicine), and structures (registries, militia, state TV, DCS/DFD, Beyondism, Jewish calendar, Noahide/Public Law 102-14, school systems), grounding the inquiry in the SKPA’s framework.
- Heresy Inquiry: Reflects the updated registry (Confirmed/Unaffiliated/Heretics for Christians), with Hannah’s accusation (miracles as parables) and defense (Jefferson Bible), highlighting the SKPA’s lack of a Christian blasphemy definition.
- Jefferson Tie-In: Links Jefferson’s Koran and Bible (miracle-free) to Hannah’s argument, tying to prior pamphlets (Founders’ influence), with the verdict affirming both as heretics, framed positively.
- Board Dilemma: Shows the SKPA’s struggle—no blasphemy definition, reliance on Noahide/idolatry standards—reflecting its agnostic, data-driven ethos, with Beyondism stats as a fallback.
- Resolution: Balances order (verdict) with fairness (DCS/DFD appeal), aligning with the SKPA’s pragmatic, reason-focused approach, while respecting Hannah’s resolve.
This story captures the SKPA’s navigation of Christian heresy within its secular, law-based system, using historical ties to Jefferson to resolve a modern conflict with nuance and authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment